1) “Harper knew of Conservative Bribery”
2) “Harper Must Come Clean About Allegations of Conservative Bribery”
Seriously that is some pretty thin gruel. If I was feeling stubborn enough and I searched through the thousands of News headlines relating to Gomery and Dingwall affairs I could come up with some similarly salacious headlines used to draw readers in but then upon reading turn out to be nothing but a badly constructed reference. Anyway, I got to thinking. Although it is true that such headlines of the type the Liberals have on their site are plentiful enough, one simply does not come across headlines such as the following everyday.
1) "The NDP Caucus Supports Child Pornography?"
2) "Paul Martin Supports Child Pornography?”
And one certainly simply does not come across anything like the following in the body of any news story.
"Today, Martin says he's against child pornography. But his voting record proves
I think the Liberals should sue. After all, the Conservatives never apologized. Indeed, Harper had this to say about the headline.
CTV Asked about the 'taste' of the headline, Harper said: "What's in badhttp://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1087594937300_83004137/?hub=TopStories Think of the fun the Liberals could have in discovery. Oh the joy!
taste is the Liberal Party's record on child pornography.”
In closing out, I got to thinking about something else. Will Harper say outside of the comfy confines of the House that the tape was altered? I am sure Mr. Zytaruk wants to know. Maybe someone in the meantime could take the Harper tape to Mr. Dash.