Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Salmon Arm Observer Article

I responded to Tracy Hughes’s THE MUDDLE OF MANAGING MARIJUANA thus.

http://www.mapinc.org/tlcnews/v07/n835/a06.htm?134

“An officer there, estimated that 90 per cent of the local detachment’s files related in some way to alcohol —‑society’s legal drug.

I wonder what would happen to crime rates if we were to add another legalized drug to that list?”

If for no other reason than huge numbers of Canadians will not be charged for possession, crime rates would go down. Anyway, you are mistaken in two respects. 1) There is no firm evidence that marijuana use would sky rocket as a result of legalization. 2) Even if marijuana use did increase as a result of legalization, this would not occasion, for example, a spike in domestic violence. Marijuana is not physically addictive the way heroin, cocaine and even alcohol are and so there is no violence associated with the marijuana use and people needing a fix. Furthermore, as was noted by the US Department of Justice, there is some truth to the mellow stoner stereotype; marijuana "temporarily inhibit[s] violent behavior."

Needless to say, making marijuana legal would lead to drop in crimes associated with its illegal status.

Finally legalizing marijuana would sure up people’s respect for the law. As the Edmonton Sun noted recently most recent UN report on drug show if nothing else that
“Canadians don't care what the law says about marijuana. They're going to smoke
pot anyway. The possibility of punishment, in other words, has no deterrent effect whatsoever. As far as marijuana is concerned, Canadians think the law is an ass. And that isn't going to change.”
http://www.edmontonsun.com/Comment/2007/07/11/4330020-sun.html
Most Canadian columnists, your self excluded, and most of the Canadian public alike do not believe in the rationale for keeping it illegal. Hell even the politicians do not believe in the law. Martin, Dion, Layton and Duceppe freely admitted to having tired it. Chrétien joked about decriminalizing it and according to Gordan Gibson this is what Pierre Trudeau had this to say.
“The report [Le Dain Commission] was released as we were touring a bull-semen
facility in Guelph, Ont. (I am not making this up.) The press cared not at all about productive agriculture and totally about weed. At an end-of-tour press conference, the prime minister was asked if he favoured decriminalization. We were in the semen facility's boardroom and it had a blackboard with a permanent picture of Elsie the cow painted on, perhaps in recognition of the customer base. Mr. Trudeau was very quick. Saying not a word, he went to the blackboard, took the chalk and drew a cartoonist's balloon out of the cow's mouth. Inside he slowly wrote, "I like grass!" The room dissolved in laughter.”
http://www.cannabisculture.com/forums/printthread.php?Board=current&main=1130356&type=post

Last, but not least there are the two government reports on the
subject.

“The ordinary citizen, seeing the assertions implied by the law frequently belied by pharmacological fact or the effects that he himself experiences in the use of drugs, has long since ceased to look for a relationship between the harmfulness of a substance and its classification under criminal law. In this domain, it must be said that the criminal law is thoroughly outdated and outworn." Marie-Andrée Bertrand, Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Montreal, Le Dain Commission 1973.

http://www.marijuanaparty.com/article.php3?id_article=47

"Scientific evidence overwhelmingly indicates that cannabis is substantially less harmful than alcohol and should be treated not as a criminal issue but as a social and public health issue,"

Senator Pierre Claude Nolin, chair of the committee.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2002/09/04/pot_senate020904.html

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I might buy all that were it not for the fact that a mary jane stoned gook aimed his car at a vehicle stopped and prepared to turn left across his lane, after the gook had passed. The gook had other ideas...he rammed the stopped vehicle head on....for amusement...and damned near killed my wife.
So as one left wing nut to another, you might find some of us buying into the RC's comment that the files will increase once it is leagalized. Guaranteed there's gonna be a lot more stoned souls on the road....gut I have to allow that at least they'll be mellow when the kill someone else.

Koby said...

Do not get me wrong. I am sorry to hear about your wife, but to put it bluntly an incoherent story about a stoned out driver ramming a stopped vechicle is not an argument for believing that crime rates would increase if marijuana was ever legalized. Taken as an argument for keeping marijuana it is even worse. Indeed, change stoned driver to drunk driver and see how it sounds. A drunk driver rammed a "stopped vechile". Therefore booze should be made illegal.

As for your contention that cases of stone driving will rise as a result of legalization, the evidence is incomplete. One thing is for sure though, the equivalent of a breathalyser will not be developed for marijuana so long as the drug remains illegal. After all, marijuana's illegal status makes testing difficult to say the least.

canuckistanian said...

huh, i didn't know left wing nuts used such vile racial epithets as "gook". i guess there are stupid racist pricks on all sides of the ideological spectrum.

as far as cannabis and driving is concerned, the empirical evidence is unambiguous. in a controlled study of sober dirvers and drivers under the influence of marijuana, some rather counterituitive results were found. the study concluded that drivers under the iinfluence of marijuana were involved in less motor vehicle accidents than the control group of sober drivers. they found that drivers under the influence of marijuana did have slower reaction times, but compensated for this by being far more cautious than the control group in their driving behaviour. accordingly the result was: stoners get into less accidents than sober drivers.

Anonymous said...

LOL! ....that "Muddled" article wasn't by Karen Hughes, as in the Bush confidante. It was by someone named Tracy Hughes.

Koby said...

"LOL! ....that "Muddled" article wasn't by Karen Hughes, as in the Bush confidante. It was by someone named Tracy Hughes."

Yawn, but ok I will change it.