Friday, September 21, 2007

Policy Now

The Liberals do not have the luxury waiting until an election campaign to unveil new policy. They have to stop the bleeding and the only way of doing is come up with policies that will restore Canadians interest in the party. Besides, election campaigns are unpredictable and bold new policy is just as likely to get dismissed as an act of desperation (e.g., the Liberals proposal to ban hand guns) as it is to be celebrated. Two other points: 1) The blizzard of policy proposals unleashed by all parties becomes like white noise after a while. 2) some policies need time to mature. Such was the case with SSM. As I have said time and again, based on what the polls said the policy was clear looser. The country might have been spilt, but likely voters where not. The older one is the more likely one was to vote and to oppose SSM. The success of policy lay in the fact that pundits, academics and even bloggers ran rough shod over the Conservative position and Conservatives sustained a good deal of collateral damage. Intellectually, morally and legally bankrupt, the critics ground down the Conservative position to there was nothing left but stinking carcass of lies, obfuscations and bigotry.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

"stinking carcass of lies, obfuscations and bigotry."

well put

owen said...

I'm definitely pickin' up what you're puttin' down here. If the Libs plan on coming out with any "courageous" policies they had better do it early, but wouldn't it look just as desparate to do so immediately after losing these by-elections as to do so at the start of a campaign?

Koby said...

That is a good point, but I think there is a difference. It is one thing to release policy as a means of staving off defeat; it is quite another to release policy as a reaction to what obviously has been a failed approach.

Koby said...

New policy is natural extension of the Liberal's rebirth talking point.